In silico–guided Design and Endonuclease-Based Functional Validation of sgRNAs Targeting ERBB2 Transmembrane and Kinase Domains

Via Susana Gunsi, Anugrah Prima Dirgahyu, Karlia Meitha, Antonius Christianto, Marselina Irasonia Tan

Abstract


BACKGROUND: Erythroblastic oncogene B2 (ERBB2) overexpression promotes breast cancer progression through activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/Akt) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways. Although CRISPR–Cas9 enables precise gene disruption, sgRNA efficiency is strongly influenced by target sequence and structural features, necessitating careful in silico design and validation. This study aimed to design and evaluate sgRNAs targeting the transmembrane- and tyrosine kinase–encoding regions of ERBB2.

METHODS: Candidate sgRNAs were selected using CHOPCHOP, CRISPOR, and CRISPR RGEN, followed by secondary structure analysis with RNAfold to assess folding stability and scaffold integrity. sgRNAs were synthesized via in vitro transcription and assembled with Cas9 protein to form ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes. In vitro endonuclease assays were performed using PCR-amplified ERBB2 fragments derived from SK-OV3 genomic DNA, corresponding to exon 22 (523 bp) and exon 25 (933 bp). sgRNAs targeting eIF4E1 served as positive controls.

RESULTS: Two sgRNAs meeting all in silico criteria were selected. Secondary structure prediction confirmed that both sgRNAs possessed essential structural elements required for Cas9 interaction including the repeat–anti-repeat region and three stem–loop structures. In vitro endonuclease assays demonstrated that the sgRNA targeting exon 22 of ERBB2 successfully cleaved its target DNA, producing fragments of 266 bp and 257 bp. Similar cleavage activity was observed in the two control sgRNAs, which generated fragments of 384 bp and 303 bp, and 486 bp and 201 bp, respectively. In contrast, the sgRNA targeting exon 25 of ERBB2 exhibited no detectable cleavage activity.

CONCLUSION: The sgRNA targeting exon 22 of ERBB2 demonstrated effective DNA cleavage activity in vitro, whereas the sgRNA targeting exon 25 showed no endonuclease activity.

KEYWORDS: CRISPR–Cas9, endonuclease, ERBB2, in vitro, breast cancer, RNP, sgRNA


Full Text:

PDF SUPPLEMENT

References


Retnowardani A, Kresno SB, Arif M. Association of obesity and breast cancer risk: The role of estrogen, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and adiponectin as risk factors (preliminary study). Indones Biomed J. 2009; 1(1): 45-52, CrossRef.

Abdihalim TSA, Idris AAA. Mucin level as a potential biomarker for breast cancer diagnosis. Mol Cell Biomed Sci. 2022; 6(3): 117-20, CrossRef.

Widowati W, Jasaputra DK, Sumitro SB, Widodo MA, Bachtiar I, Faried A, et al. Direct and indirect effect of TNFα and IFNγ toward apoptosis in breast cancer cells. 2018; 2(2): 60-9, CrossRef.

Salamah R, Wijayanti N, Widiyanto S. n-hexane fraction of Cucumis melo L. cultivar gama melon parfum: an in vitro study in MCF7 and T47D cells line. Mol Cell Biomed Sci. 2025; 9(2): 69-123, CrossRef.

Yarden Y, Sliwkowski MX. Untangling the ErbB signalling network. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001; 2(2): 127-37, CrossRef.

Santhanakrishnan J, Meganathan P, Vedagiri H. Structural biology of HER2 / ERBB2 dimerization : Mechanistic insights and differential roles in healthy versus cancerous cells. Explor Med. 2024; 5: 530-43, CrossRef.

Pan LH, Li JL, Xu Q, Gao ZL, Yang M, Wu XP, et al. HER2/PI3K/AKT pathway in HER2-positive breast cancer: A review. Medicine. 2024; 103(24): e38508, CrossRef.

Fleishman SJ, Schlessinger J, Bental N. A putative molecular-activation switch in the transmembrane domain of erbB2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002; 99(25): 15937-40, CrossRef.

Dittrich A, Gautrey H, Browell D, Tyson-Capper A. The HER2 signaling network in breast cancer-like a spider in its web. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2014; 19(3-4): 253-70, CrossRef.

Dass CR, Choong PFM. Gene therapy for osteosarcoma: Steps towards clinical studies. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2008; 60(4): 405-13, CrossRef.

Meiliana A, Dewi NM, Wijaya A. Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 systems: Basic research and clinical applications. Indones Biomed J. 2017; 9(1): 1-16, CrossRef.

Mojica FJM, Juez G, Rodriguez‐Valera F. Transcription at different salinities of Haloferax mediterranei sequences adjacent to partially modified PstI sites. Mol Microbiol. 1993; 9(3): 613-21, CrossRef.

Bolotin A, Quinquis B, Sorokin A, Ehrlich SD. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPRs) have spacers of extrachromosomal origin. Microbiology. 2005; 151(8): 2551-61, CrossRef.

BrounsRutering J, Ilmer M, Recio A, Coleman M, Vykoukal J, Alt E, et al. Small CRISPR RNAs guide antiviral defense in prokaryotes. Science. 2008; 5(6): 1-8, CrossRef.

Deltcheva E, Chylinski K, Sharma CM, Gonzales K, Chao Y, Pirzada ZA, et al. CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III. Nature. 2011; 471(7340): 602-7, CrossRef.

Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNA - guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immuniy. Science. 2012; 337: 816-21, CrossRef.

Hiranniramol K, Chen Y, Chen Y, Liu W, Liu W, Wang X. Generalizable sgRNA design for improved CRISPR/Cas9 editing efficiency. Bioinformatics. 2020; 36(9): 2684-9, CrossRef.

Mehravar M, Shirazi A, Mehrazar MM, Nazari M. In vitro pre-validation of gene editing by CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol. 2019; 11(3): 259-63, PMID.

Doench JG, Hartenian E, Graham DB, Tothova Z, Hegde M, Smith I, et al. Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene inactivation. Nat Biotechnol. 2014; 32(12): 1262-7, CrossRef.

Liu X, Homma A, Sayadi J, Yang S, Ohashi J, Takumi T. Sequence features associated with the cleavage efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 system. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 1-9, CrossRef.

Wang H, Sun W. CRISPR-mediated targeting of HER2 inhibits cell proliferation through a dominant negative mutation. Cancer Lett. 2017: 385: 137-43, CrossRef.

Kim S, Kim D, Cho SW, Kim J, Kim J soo. Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Genome Res. 2014; 24(6): 1012-9, CrossRef.

Labun K, Montague TG, Krause M, Cleuren YNT, Valen E. CHOPCHOP v3 : Expanding the CRISPR web toolbox beyond genome editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47(W1): W171-4, CrossRef.

Concordet J paul, Haeussler M. CRISPOR : Intuitive guide selection for CRISPR / Cas9 genome editing experiments and screens. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46(W1): W242-5, CrossRef.

Bae S, Park J, Kim JS. Cas-OFFinder : A fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(10): 1473-5, CrossRef.

Gruber AR, Lorenz R, Bernhart SH, Neubo R, Hofacker IL. The Vienna RNA Websuite. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36: 70-4, CrossRef.

Tham J, Patisenah A, Tjia TOS, Signorelli S, Taufik I, Meitha K. sgRNA design and in vitro nucleolytic analysis of the Cas9‐RNP complex for transgene‐free genome editing of the eIF4E1 gene from Capsicum an‐ nuum L. Indones J Biotechnol. 2023; 28(4): 238, CrossRef.

Zhu W, Liu C, Lu T, Zhang Y, Zhang S, Chen Q. Knockout of EGFL6 by CRISPR / Cas9 mediated inhibition of tumor angiogenesis in ovarian cancer. Front Oncol. 2020: 10: 1451, CrossRef.

Lykke-Andersen S, Jensen TH. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay: An intricate machinery that shapes transcriptomes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015; 16(11): 665-77, CrossRef.

Akhmetova L, Montague TG, Valen E, Schier AF, Thyme SB. Internal guide RNA interactions interfere with Cas9-mediated cleavage. Nat Commun. 2016: 7: 11750, CrossRef.

Bradford J, Perrin D. A benchmark of computational CRISPR-Cas9 guide design methods. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019; 15(8): e1007274, CrossRef.

Nishimasu H, Ran FA, Hsu PD, Konermann S, Shehata SI, Dohmae N, et al. Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell. 2014; 156(5): 935-49, CrossRef.

Liang G, Zhang H, Lou D, Yu D. Selection of highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR / Cas9-based plant genome editing. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 21451, CrossRef.

Grainger S, Lonquich B, Oon CH, Nguyen N, Willert K, Traver D. CRISPR guide RNA validation in vitro. Zebrafish. 2017; 14(4): 383-6, CrossRef.

Jiang F, Doudna JA. CRISPR - Cas9 structures and mechanisms. Annu Rev Biophys. 2017: 46: 505-29, CrossRef.

Miller JC, Holmes MC, Wang J, Guschin DY, Lee YL, Rupniewski I, et al. An improved zinc-finger nuclease architecture for highly specific genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2007; 25(7): 778-85, CrossRef.

Riesenberg S, Helmbrecht N, Kanis P, Maricic T, Pääbo S. Improved gRNA secondary structures allow editing of target sites resistant to CRISPR-Cas9 cleavage. Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1): 489, CrossRef.

Arsita EV, Nugrahaningsih DA, Sadewa AH. GSTM1 deletion compensated in mRNA expression and 4T1 viability after editing using CRISPR/Cas9 single and double gRNA. Indones Biomed J. 2023; (1): 124-31, CrossRef.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18585/inabj.v18i2.4048

Copyright (c) 2026 The Prodia Education and Research Institute

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 Indexed by:

                  

                     

          

 

 

The Prodia Education and Research Institute